Finn's Take· TL;DRPresident Trump spent months publicly pressuring the Federal Reserve to slash its benchmark rates, claiming it would be "Rocket Fuel!" for growth and make housing more affordable. That promise now looks increasingly hollow. Since the war in Iran began at the end of February, borrowing money has become more expensive, meaning fewer families can afford mortgages or auto loans. The gap between what Trump promised and what Americans are actually experiencing is growing — and it's becoming a political problem.
The president has long vilified high rates as an affront to the size and strength of the U.S. economy, saying that America deserves the cheapest borrowing costs in the world. But wanting something and getting it are very different things — especially when the forces driving rates higher are, in large part, products of Trump's own decisions.
His tariffs that began last year caused rates to jump so quickly that he backed off and reformulated them. That whiplash sent bond markets into a tailspin and spooked investors. Then came another self-inflicted complication: Trump championed the construction of data centers for artificial intelligence, but the bonds financing those projects appear to have helped push up interest rates. And the war in Iran has fueled rising oil prices. Each of these factors — tariffs, AI infrastructure spending, and military conflict — has stacked pressure on top of pressure, keeping borrowing costs stubbornly elevated.
The government is getting squeezed, too — having spent $827 billion so far this fiscal year to service the national debt, more than it has devoted to national defense. That staggering figure underscores just how expensive high rates are not just for everyday Americans, but for the federal government itself. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note, which mortgage rates follow, has risen sharply since Trump and Israel launched attacks on Iran, sending global energy prices skyrocketing and making it difficult for the Federal Reserve to deliver rate cuts anytime soon.
The Fed voted 11-1 to maintain rates at 3.5% to 3.75%. In its statement, the Fed acknowledged economic uncertainty stemming from the Iran war, noting that economic activity "had been expanding at a solid pace" while employment growth remained modest — but that inflation "remains somewhat elevated." Officials said they anticipate future rate reductions, projecting one cut this year and another in 2027, though the precise timing remains undetermined.
The White House is banking on the war's end as the key to unlocking relief. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the end of the Iran war would ultimately reduce energy costs and allow the Fed to reduce rates, arguing that "oil prices — and thus overall inflation — will plummet again when President Trump forces a successful resolution with Iran." It's a hopeful argument, but one that depends entirely on a military and diplomatic outcome that remains far from certain.
Republicans had hoped to show clear progress on affordability ahead of the midterms. Trump can point to a low unemployment rate and solid consumer spending as proof that the economy remains stable, yet there are few signs that these arguments have connected with the public. Voters tend to feel the economy through their wallets — mortgage payments, car loans, credit card rates — and on all of those fronts, the pain is real.
The prospect of higher borrowing costs has become troublesome for Republicans in the November elections, as Trump's own policies helped drive the increase. With midterms approaching, the administration faces a difficult task: convincing Americans that relief is on the way while the very policies that were supposed to deliver that relief continue to work against it. The "rocket fuel" Trump promised may still be sitting on the launchpad.